JERUSALEM 3000
The History of Jerusalem -- The Stairway to Heaven
Lecture 6 - The Rise of Herod
By: Alick Isaacs
Introduction
The rule of the Hasmonean kingdom relied upon the support of
Rome. But, the Hasmonean kings were not without enemies. In
particular these enemies came from within the Hasmonean
family. Internal strife lead to instability and instability
ultimately lead to the loss of Roman support for a regime no
longer able to maintain the peace. In 67 BCE civil war broke
out between Hyrcanus II and his brother Judah Aristobulus.
The two brothers engaged in an open military conflict over
the control of the Temple Mount. This war brings us to
another critical juncture in the history of Jerusalem where
both a fascination for the Temple Mount, and the political
centrality of Jerusalem come into play. The internal power
struggle which reflects their perception of Mount Moriah as
the source of power was ultimately decided by the
intervention of the Roman empire.
In 63 BCE Pompey conquered the Temple Mount and Jerusalem
bringing an end to the short era of political independence
provided by the Hasmonean kings. Jewish rule established in
the age of Greek decline came to an end as the Roman empire
attained full strength. The period of independence was
followed by Roman conquest. As the empires switched so
fluctuated the fate of the city of Jerusalem.
Between 63 and 37 BCE Jerusalem experienced a period of
political instability. After conquering the city, Pompey
reappointed the Hasmonean king as ruler of the city. He was
stripped of his royal title and renamed 'Ethnarch' a
position which did not grant the Hasmonean family the same
hereditary privileges enjoyed by Royalty. As ethnarchs, the
Hasmoneans became the puppets of Rome sending their taxes to
Rome. In 40 BCE the Hasmonean ethnarch Antigonus, emulating
his glorious ancestor Judah, rebelled against Rome and
announced the independence of his kingdom from Roman rule.
The immediate consequence of his declaration was Roman
invasion of Jerusalem. This time the Hasmonean line of power
came to a final end and the era of 'Roman' rule in Jerusalem
began.
2. King Herod - Jew or Roman?
The era of Roman rule begins with the reign of King Herod
from 37 BCE to 4 BCE. This is undoubtedly a period of
tremendous prosperity and growth.
During Herod's rule the city of Jerusalem was never attacked
nor did it even face the prospect of destruction. The city
grew, the economy boomed, new buildings were built and
market places opened in new, busy streets. Herod, who faced
no threats from without proved his virility, his greatness
and power by building. Without the opportunity of leaving
his mark in combat, he turned to architecture changing the
face of the city of Jerusalem. He built himself a
magnificent palace surrounded by three great tall towers; he
built the fortress of Massada; the city of Caeseria and most
important of all he refurbished the Second Temple.
Sceptical psycho-historians have said of Herod that he must
have had an 'edifice' complex!
The years of Herod's rule are generally considered, along
with the rule of King Solomon, as the golden age of
Jerusalem. During these years Jerusalem enjoyed
international fame as one of the most beautiful cities in
the world. Herod's Temple in Jerusalem was surely one of the
most magnificent, if not the most magnificent, of structures
erected in antiquity. But these were tense and ambivalent
times. The cultural identity of the holy city was as
confused as the Jewish identity of the king himself. I
mentioned last week that Herod was a product of the forced
conversion of the Idumieans by John Hyrcanus in 113 BCE.
These converts were not quite Jewish in culture even
although they remained Jewish in religious practice. Herod
became king of Jerusalem because on the one hand the Romans
considered him a Jew on whom they may impose their
authority; but they knew also that he was not recognised as
a Jew amongst the people over whom he ruled. He did not
enjoy their affections and was therefore obligated to Rome
in order to maintain his crown.
Herod was a bridge between Rome and Jerusalem. He was a man
who lived in total isolation; a Jew in the eyes of the
Romans and a Roman in the eyes of the Jews.
3. Herod and the Hasmoneans
Herod sought to consolidate his power and win the confidence
of his people. His first move had disastrous repercussions.
He married Miriamne, the youngest daughter of the Hasmonean
house. Josephus Flavius, the most important historical
source which we have from this period, describes in detail
the fateful story of their turbulent marriage. Herod married
into the Hasmonean family in the hope of earning the
confidence of his people who were now to regard him as an
offshoot of the popular Hasmonean line. He soon became
infatuated with his beautiful bride and obsessive about her
family. His entry into the Hasmonean family brought him into
close contact with the household which he was soon to regard
as the greatest threat to the stability of his reign. Herod
became convinced that they were determined to overthrow his
rule. He reacted violently. He murdered his wife's mother
Shlomzion (Solome Alexandra) and proceeded to assassinate
the whole family line.
After Miriamne petitioned him to appoint her brother
Aristobulus High Priest in Jerusalem Herod acquiesced. On
witnessing his popularity in the Temple he became jealous
and Aristobulus too met a nasty end.
According to Josephus, he was found dead in Herod's winter
palace in Jericho. Herod murdered his own two children
because they too were the sons of Miriamne the Hasmonean. He
went on to murder Miriamne herself, convinced that she was
plotting to overthrow him and declare herself Queen.
The Talmud gives an alternative account of Miriamne's death.
While the details in this account are not even intended to
be historically accurate, the Talmudic homily, as we shall
see, is possessed with deep insight.
"Herod was the slave of the Hasmonean house and had set his
eyes on a certain maiden of that house. One day he heard a
Bath Kol say 'Every slave that rebels will now succeed' So
he rose and killed all the members of his master's
household, but spared that maiden. When she saw that he
wanted to marry her she went up on to a roof and cried out
'Whoever comes and says I am from the Hsmonean house is a
slave since I alone am left of it and I am throwing myself
down from this roof. He preserved her body in honey for
seven years. Some say that he had intercourse with her
others that he did not." [Talmud Baba Bathra 3b]
This version of the story is very different from Josephus's
account. The core facts are of course similar. Herod was a
king who "stole" his throne and overthrew the Hasmonean line
killing off the rest of the family. He married the lovely
and wretched Miriamne and she did in fact come to a 'sticky'
end. But there are still a few important differences between
this account and Josephus's. First among them, in the
Talmudic story Miriamne isn't killed by Herod. She commits
suicide before their marriage, hurling herself from a roof.
Second, there is no verification for the legend that Herod
preserved Miriamne's dead body in honey and there are no
real grounds for the suspicion that Herod was in fact guilty
of necrophilia.
The Talmudic story, I think, was written in order to make
clear some pertinent points. Herod was madly in love with
Miriamne; thus he was unable to part from her even after her
death. It was his jealous passion which brought about her
end and that of her entire family. The Talmud's account of
Miriamne throwing herself off the roof suggests that her
marrying Herod was an act of suicide which brought her down
along with the rest of the family. Herod was a rebellious
impassioned slave who molested and defiled the dignity of
the Hasmonean line, attempting to continue reaping personal
and political benefit from the dead body of Miriamne's
family by calling himslef Hsmonean. But as Miriamne declares
he remains nothing more than a slave. Herod's embalming the
dead Miriamne expresses more than his physical passion for
her. Herod preserved the sweet exterior of his dead wife,
who is a symbol here for the Hasmonean family, which is by
now defiled, desecrated and cynically exploited. The
insinuation that Herod was guilty of necrophilia I am
suggesting, is simply a metaphor for this exploitation.
Miriamne's marriage to Herod was thus an act of suicide a
marriage consecrated only after her death.
4. Herod Builds the Temple
The most remarkable project which Herod conducted as king of
Jerusalem was the refurbishing of the Second Temple. The
great and magnificent Temple which stood in Jerusalem during
the second Temple period whose original spleandour has only
really been rediscovered by archeologists since the Israeli
victory in the Six Day War in 1967, in fact only stood for
the last hundred years of the period. The famous Western or
Wailing wall was part of the redesigned and rebuilt version
of the second Temple whose construction was conducted on
Herod's initiative. The Western Wall is one of four
supporting walls which Herod built around the Temple Mount
in order to enlarge the Mount and lay the foundations for
the large stone plateau which was to support the new
refurbished Temple.
Herod's Temple, though it stood on top of the original
Temple Mount, was far grander than any building which the
original proportions of Mount Moriah could have supported.
The building itself was magnificent. It stood high above the
rest of the city, with a glistening decorative golden crown
which adorned the top of a marble and stone blue green
shrine described in the Talmud as looking like the golden
sun, shining on the green blue sea. The outer courtyards of
the Temple filled with pilgrims, approximately 250,000 of
whom came every year to celebrate the jewish pilgrim or
"foot" festivals in Jerusalem. They came from all over Judea
to gather together and to offer sacrifices on the Temple
Mount.
The Royal Basilica or 'Stowe' with its rows of Corinthian
pillars was at the southernmost edge of the plateau. This
was specially built on Herod's southern extention of the
Temple Mount where non-Jewish visitors and Roman dignitaries
were permitted by Jewish law to stand and view the glorious
spectacle below. The Temple attracted cultural and economic
activity to the city which boomed during this, its golden
age, and the crown of Jerusalem glistened with its new
Jewel.
5. Why did Herod build the Temple?
Herod's magnificent new refurbished Temple embodied all the
cultural ambivalence of the second Temple period. The House
of God, built on the site where God revealed himself to
Abraham was a Hellenistic palace. Its marble and its stone,
the gold and the corinths, the basilicas and porticos, all
exquisite and lavish, were of Roman Hellenistic fashion and
design. The Temple glorified Herod the Great as much as it
glorified God. Moreover, the Antonia fortress which stood to
the North of the Temple and whose towers were taller than
the Temple's was so named after Mark Anthony Caesar of Rome.
One may presume that Herod who was of a complex nature built
the Temple for many different and conflicting reasons; to
glorify his name as a great builder; to ingratiate himself
with the people over whom he ruled and with the God whom he
seems to have feared. He built the Temple to win the support
of the powerful priestly class, the Sadducees who were the
most influential party in Jerusalem. He provided them with a
magnificent Temple and at the same time murdered thirty five
of their opponents, the Rabbis of the
Sanhedrin.
The Rabbis were not unaware of the ambivalence which
surrounded the Temple. The Talmud tells the story of Baba
ben Butha, whom Herod tortured in the hope of coercing him
into an act of treason by cusing the king:-
"But how could Baba b. Butha have advised Herod to pull down
the Temple [in order to refurbish it]? He [Herod] arose and
killed all the Rabbis sparing Baba b. Butha that he might
take counsel of him. He placed on his head a garland of
hedgehog bristles and put out his eyes. One day he came and
sat before him and said: See sir, what this wicked slave
[Herod] does. What do you want me to do to him, replied Baba
b. Butha. I want you to curse him. He replied with the verse
"even in thy thoughts thou shouldst not curse a king". Said
Herod to him, but this is no king.
He replied even though he be only a rich man it is written
"and in thy bedchamber do not curse the rich...He said I am
afraid of him. But said Herod there is noone who can go and
tell him since we two are quite alone. He replied "for a
bird of the heaven shall carry the voice...Herod then said I
am Herod. Had I known that theRabbis were so circumspect I
should not have killed them. Now tell me what amends I can
make. He replied Gonow and attend to the light of the
world...which is the Temple." [Talmud Baba Bathra 3b-4a]
The story attributes the credit for the building of the
Temple to the wisdom of Baba ben Butha. In building the
Temple, according to this story, Herod is an instrument in
the hands of the Rabbis. According to this account Herod
recognises Baba ben Butha's wisdom after trying to trick him
into treason and builds the Temple to appease the Rabbis not
the priests. Herod builds the Temple as a penance for his
sin of murdering the Rabbis. The story reveals the
ambivalence and divisiveness which surrounded the building
of the Temple and which characterise the rule of Herod in
general. During this time it is already clear that the Jews
of Jerusalem are not united. Internal tension is a threat to
their cultural unity. The Priests do not except the laws of
the Rabbis and the Rabbis struggle to maintain a foothold in
the most important institution of the time the Temple. Thus
they move their high court, the Sanhedrin, to the Temple's
outer courtyard and attribute the building of the Temple to
Baba ben Butha.
6. The Death of Herod and the Sects
Herod's rule, though ambivalent was stable. Herod's
Jerusalem which was ruled with violence and terror prospered
and grew. Herod refortified the city and extended its walls.
Herod knew how to manipulate the support of Rome in his
favour. He knew how to use Roman support to serve his own
interests and he understood that the Romans knew that his
interests were theirs. For all his evils, it is Herod's
death which marks the beginning of the end of the second
Temple period. The Jewish world was divided and volatile.
Josephus describes the different factions and sects which
emerged in Jerusalem during this period. These were held at
bay by Herod, but after his death in 4 BCE "all hell broke
loose".
The death of the innocents described in the book of Matthew
as Herod's search to kill the child who was to be "King of
the Jews" occurred around the time of Herod's death.
According to Josephus, Herod wanted the mothers of Judea to
cry on the day he died. He left behind him a divided and
tense Jewish society in Jerusalem. The Jews were divided
into sects: "Pharisees" (Rabbis) and "Sadducees" (Priests -
The descendants of Tsadok grandson of Aharon). As the Temple
ritual which was conducted by the priests became corrupted
and politicised, the disgusted "Essenes" moved away from the
city to the Judean desert where they conducted a monastic
way of life in Qumran. In their utopian desert society they
practiced celibacy, observing strict laws of ritual purity
and conducting a communal way of life. They engaged in study
generating the most remarkable library of Biblical documents
amending these with apocalyptic interpretations. This
remarkable literary activity was preserved for two thousand
years in clay canisters which were discovered by accident by
a bedouin boy playing in the caves above Qumran in 1947.
Corruption of the Temple rituals brought Jesus of Nazareth
to overturn the tables of the moneychangers who overcharged
pilgrims as they purchased animals for sacrifice in the
market places at the south western corner of the Temple
Mount. Jerusalem after the time of Herod became unstable.
Political instability provoked violent and even rebellious
reactions. Partisan groups known as the "Zealots" began
rebellious activity against the Romans. As these factions
broke off, Pharisees, Sadducees, Judeo-Christians, Essenes
and Zealots fought amongst themselves and against Rome.
Roman rule became more and more intolerable as the Romans
increased the burden of taxation in an attempt to crush the
revolutionary activity. The tension between the Jews and the
Romans gradually built up until it eventually exploded into
a great Revolt in the year 66 CE.