|
SEVEN LIES ABOUT JENIN
(Commentary by Dr. David Sangan, Ma'ariv, 8.11.2002, Weekend Supplement)
[Translation by Israel Government Press Office]
(with kind
permission of © Maariv)
I watched Muhammad Bakhri's film Jenin, Jenin in a limited forum,
with Jerusalem Cinematheque Director Leah Van Leer and several journalists.
After the private screening, I responded and indicated each lie
and lack of credibility. One of those present at the screening was
outraged: "If you don't accept the facts in the film, you apparently
don't understand anything; how can you be a doctor?"
For a moment, I forgot that I had been in Jenin last April, serving
as a regional brigade doctor, while this viewer had, at best, been
fed on rumors. Bakhri expertly weaves together lies and half-truths
until it becomes very difficult not to be seduced by the distorted
picture he creates.
I did not succeed in convincing the Cinematheque management to
cancel the screening. I was told that the pictures of destroyed
homes were authentic and that there was, therefore, truth in the
film, and that the film would be shown around the world in any case.
Even so, I was invited to its premiere screening in Jerusalem and
I arrived in order to explain my position to the audience. Following
are several points that I wished to raise to the audience:
1. Dr. Abu Riali, director of the hospital in Jenin, claims in
the film that the western wing of the hospital was shelled and destroyed
and that the IDF knowingly hit the hospital's water and power supplies.
There never was any such wing and, in any case, no part of the hospital
was either shelled or blown up. IDF soldiers took care not to enter
its grounds even though we knew that it was serving as a refuge
for several wanted fugitives. We guarded the water, electricity
and oxygen supplies to the hospital all throughout the fighting
and assisted in setting up an emergency generator after the city's
electrical system was damaged. Bakri himself is seen in the film
wandering the hospital's clean and well-kept corridors, but not
in the blown up wing. I met him outside the theater and asked him
if he had visited the western wing. At first he said no, then he
corrected himself and said, "You remember one moment in the
film with shattered glass - it was from there." It is important
to point out that this Abu Riali is one of the "authorized
sources" for the claim of a "massacre." At the beginning
of the operation, he was interviewed on Al-Jazeera television and
spoke of, "thousands of victims."
2. Another impressive part of the film is the interview with a
male 75-year-old Jenin resident who mumbles and cries and tells
how he was taken out of his bed in the middle of the night, shot
in the hand, and after he failed to obey the soldiers' command to
get up, was shot again in the foot. I met this very same old man
as he was brought to me after an operation to clear one of the Hamas
cells' houses in the refugee camp. He had indeed been lightly injured
in the hand and was suffering from a minor scratch on the foot,
but certainly not as the result of a bullet. IDF soldiers transferred
him to a secure station that had been set up to treat wounded and
there he was treated by me, among others. One of the military doctors
identified diagnosed a heart problem. We suggested that he be transferred
immediately to Haemek Hospital in Afula for treatment. He asked
to be treated at the hospital in Jenin since he did not speak Hebrew.
After the hospital refused to admit him, we transferred him to Afula
and he stayed there for three days in the internal medicine department
for treatment of his heart problems and the anemia that he suffered
from as a result of another chronic illness.
3. Another person who was interviewed spoke about a baby who suffered
a chest wound from a bullet that entered through his chest and exited
his body, creating a hole in his back. According to the film the
baby died after IDF soldiers prevented his evacuation to hospital.
A baby's body with this type of injury has never been found. Moreover,
such an injury would have been fatal, and evacuation would not have
saved his life. What is this baby's name? Where did his body disappear
to?
4. The same person interviewed also told how, using his finger,
he opened the baby's airway in his neck after he was injured. Again,
a complete lie. Such an action cannot be carried out with a finger.
This "witness" adds that tanks ran over living people
many times until they were completely crushed - this never happened
and is imaginary.
5. The film mentions a mass gravesite that IDF soldiers dug for
Palestinian dead. Every international organization that investigated
the matter concur that there were 52 Palestinian dead in Jenin,
and that all the bodies were returned to the Palestinians for burial.
Bakri does not bother to show the supposed location of this mass
gravesite.
6. Israeli planes that supposedly bombed the city are mentioned
in the film. There were no such planes. In order to prevent civilian
casualties, only focused helicopter fire was used.
7. It is interesting to note that Bakhri was not present in Jenin
at the time of the operation, and only arrived two weeks after it
was completed. In pictures shot at the site in the center of Jenin,
the damage appears much larger than it was in actual fact, and the
martyrs' pictures and jihad slogans - which had been present at
the time of the IDF military operation - had disappeared from the
walls of houses. The film systematically and repeatedly uses manipulative
pictures of tanks taken in other locations, artificially placing
them next to pictures of Palestinian children.
In general, this is a vulgar, but extremely well done, work of
manipulation.
At the conclusion of the film, hundreds of viewers gave Bakri
and the film's editor a standing ovation. Bakri asked the audience
if there were any questions. I presented myself, I went up to the
stage and began to systematically list the lies and inaccuracies
in the film.
At first there were whispers in the audience, and later scornful
calls, and I was labeled a "murderer," "war criminal"
etc. I had barely succeeded in finishing my second point when a
man in the audience aggressively came up on stage and tried to take
the microphone out of my hand. I decided not to be dragged into
violence. I allowed him to take the microphone and left the stage.
I was surprised that only a few people stood up for my right to
free speech and free expression. I was shocked that the audience
was unwilling to hear the facts from someone who had physically
been there.
It was difficult for me as a person, as a father and a doctor
to hear calls of "murderer" from my people. I said that
I did not kill anyone. But the calls became more heated, immense
hatred was directed towards me. It left me with a hard feeling that
has not subsided. I am not sorry that I went to the Cinematheque
that evening. I am certain that in any case there were people who
heard my doubts, and that this changed a small amount of their feelings
towards the "facts" they saw. I am sure there were other
people who were shocked at the intolerance demonstrated by the audience,
but even so, it is hard for me [to accept] that they were the silent
minority.
Allow me to say what I was unable to say to those people that
evening. I am proud that I was part of this excellent and ethical
force that operated in Jenin, regular army soldiers and reservists
with motivation and a fighting spirit, who went to destroy the terrorist
infrastructure in its capital. Many suicide-bombers came from Jenin,
and were responsible for the murder of the elderly, women and children
on our streets. I am proud that we were there, that we fought, and
I also am proud of the morality of the battle. The camp was not
bombed from the air in order to prevent innocent civilian casualties,
and artillery was not used even though we knew about specific areas
in the [refugee] camp where terrorists were holing up. IDF soldiers
fought against terrorists, and terrorists only. Before destroying
a building where terrorist fire against our soldiers had originated
from, as many warnings as could be allowed, were given, so that
the people could leave without injury. The medical team administered
medical aid to all casualties, even if they had Hamas tattoos on
their hands. At no point was any person refused medical treatment.
This battle, heroic on one hand and ethical on the other, took
a heavy toll from the best of our fighters! We who had to be there
- the soldiers that fell there, their families and the IDF - do
not deserve that Muhammad Bakri should incite the world to murder
and hatred at our expense.
[See What happened in Jenin? at
http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/go.asp?MFAH0i9o0#jenin
]
|