 |
 |
 |
He was naturally blessed with many wondrous
combinations of traits.
He combined a fine soul with a handsome figure. Everything about him was
charming, both inwardly and outwardly: his noble stature, his countenance,
the warmth of his gaze, the pleasant timbre of his voice, his generous
smile. There was charm in his every move. Gracious and magnificent charms
together produced admiration and wonder, yet were not intimidating but
rather heartwarming, drawing one to him and creating bonds of affection
even while inspiring awe. Whoever saw him and enjoyed the radiance and
splendor about him felt as though he himself were lacking, flawed in body
and soul. But for whoever had the privilege of glancing at his face once,
this would suffice – as Rabbi Yehuda Hanassi said of Rabbi Meir
– for his entire life.
Both dreamer and man of action, visionary of redemption, he soared far
in his flight without becoming entangled in imaginings and fantasies.
Rather, he watched his goal with clear eyes, and wisely and honestly considered
the means for achieving it, showing excellent perception even regarding
subtle maneuvers, and adeptly choosing the right time to realize his distant
dream and vision; a combination of innocence and astuteness.
The fury and defiance of a forceful, resolute warrior were combined with
the tenderness and delicacy of a spiritual poet’s soul, and a heart
full of grace and mercy. A rebel and revolutionary – rebel against
his past and his generation, rebel against a long tradition of assimilation
–with the refinement and charm of a courteous gentleman, fond of
polished manners and careful of the dignity of his fellow man; a blend
of nobleness and informality, he was both a loner dwelling in the shrine
of literature and a man who goes about in society.
A blend of devotion with joy of living, of idealistic purity and sacredness
together with hedonistic pleasures – a new conception of sacredness
and purity, which turns away from abstinence and frugality.
One is aware that such pairings of opposites are precious and rare, and
the rarest of all is the combination of a great soul with the inclination
towards public or political action. “As a rule, a man is sociable
just in the degree in which he is intellectually poor and generally vulgar…”
(Schopenhauer).
He arrived at the idea of Jewish redemption not out of solidarity for
the Jewish nation and its culture, but out of general solidarity for humanity,
sorrow and empathy for the nation’s hardships and the oppression
and degeneration it suffered, moral indignation at the wickedness of the
gentiles and the world-encompassing injustice of the nations, and a sense
of beauty that rebelled against the ugliness of exile. And it is this
– the human, moral-aesthetic element, the superior philanthropic
element if you like – that gives his approach its innovation and
its excellence.
Some say it was the Dreyfus affair that led him to seek a solution for
the Jewish question in national independence or in a Jewish state. But
this is like saying that the falling of the apple led Newton to discover
the law of gravity. This affair was only an external factor, not a motive
but merely an incidental catalyst, the timely reason for the bursting
forth of his moral fury and defiance. It was what set off the revolution
within him, elevating the concept of a nation to the glorious, heroic
level of the people’s redemption in the land of Israel.
And it is also one of the secrets of his tremendous influence on all levels
of the nation. He appeared before it suddenly, from the outside rather
than from within the Jewish world, not waving the banner of the Torah
or of the spirit of Judaism, but rather of a demand for national freedom
in the name of human morality. He was the first visionary of Israel’s
redemption in this secular aspect, the aspect in which it is “like
all other nations”.
Therefore his appearance in itself, even if it had not generated such
a colossal enterprise, would still represent a change of values and a
revolution unprecedented in our national history. For many generations
to come we will yet have a need for the edifying influence of that sudden
appearance: the spirit of Herzl in each and every generation.
|
|
| Time
line |
| - 4000 |
|
| - 3800 |
|
| - 3100 |
|
| - 2900 |
|
| - 1700 |
|
| - 1690 |
|
| - 1400 |
|
| - 1100 |
|
| - 1000 |
|
| - 990 |
|
| - 950 |
|
|
 |
 |