|
|
Lessons from the Past - Simulation for Yitzhak
Rabin Memorial
1995 - Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated: our world seemed
to be crumbling around our ears. We grieved, wept and hoped that "others"
would learn lessons from this tragedy.
We sang songs of hope, awaited perspective and improvement, devised
tolerance & reconciliation workshops, and analyzed the social and
political phenomena - ad nauseam.
One year later we mourned in remembrance and
asked a number of questions, including how to remember Yitzhak Rabin,
aware that it was a new culture, rather than not a personality cult which
we wanted to develop.
Three years on, we had an official memorial
day but the opinion leaders proclaimed we had learned nothing and the
social climate in Israel had actually deterioriated. Violence and aggressive
behavior are pandemic from schools through highways to the Knesset itself.
Yet we belittle ourselves in this comprehensive condemnation: there are
so many good qualities in Israeli society, in ordinary people - since
when has criticism without some praise and some feasible alternatives
ever reformed anyone?
The simulation below has been developed around one central goal and associated
objectives, set around the emotional upheaval and ideological issues involved
in the process of: Grappling with Saying Sorry and Changing Behavior Patterns
Foreword: Saying Sorry
We all know that accusations and counter-accusations in our own lives
get us nowhere. When things go wrong, it is usually not just one party
which is at fault, there is a dynamic, regardless of who started it all.
We need all-around meaningful apologies. The assassination of Yitzhak
Rabin was considerably more significant than a disagreement between groups
of people, and its roots lie in various conflicts within Israel. It will
be an enormous challenge to try to steer so many interest groupss in one
society in new directions - but we all know from our own lives that there
are times when this must and can be done.
The impact of public apology can only be imagined: can we bring about
a day when the left and right wing will say they were wrong - when they
expressed themselves to extremes and incited public outcry, heating up
the atmosphere and animosity, albeit because they felt their ideas were
ignored, but that this was the wrong way to behave - and that they won't
do it any more?
Stage I: Hyde Park
The moderator is calling together all the lobbies and major groupings
of Israeli political life into a Hyde Park situation where each lobby,
with its major personalities, is going to set up a "soapbox"
and canvass "public" support. Description cards are provided
for each of the groupings.
Five minutes are allowed for preparation; 10 minutes are allowed for all
soapboxes to run concurrently.
Stage II: New Reality
The moderator announces that Israel cannot build itself or peace with
others in this social environment and that 4 years after the Rabin assassination,
it is everyone's responsibility to take part in creating a new atmosphere
and reality.
Each lobby or grouping must now prepare a public apology to specific groups
with which it has been at odds, and one to the general public. This ceremony
will take place before a figure of note (President, Ambassador, Consul,
member of the Rabin family).
The statement must include:
1. We apologize to... for...
2. We apologize to the Israeli public for....
3. We share with others here....
4. We respect all the other groups at this forum because they are entitled
to their legitimate viewpoints in a democracy...
5. We am committed to upholding the rule of law and the protection of
all civil rights...
6. We intend to make the following changes in our campaigning, public
relations...:....
20 minutes are allowed for preparation, during which lobbies can consult
with other groups. Groups start by defining how they believe other groups
see them and to which groups they will need to find a bridge, and regarding
what issues. The moderator should encourage the groups to take this big
step into a new future, and keep an eye on their progress.
Stage III: The Ceremony
The moderator opens the ceremony and gives the floor to the guest of
honor [see ideas in Appendix 2 below].
The moderator then calls each grouping in turn to come to the front and
make its statement.
The guest of honor receives the statements with hopes for the future.
A poem or psalms can be read; Kaddish - El Maleh Rahamim is said.
Follow-up
Was it difficult to begin working on the apology?
Why/why not?
What happened when you had to face the reality of making this apology
and setting out new game rules?
Do you think this can contribute towards improving the atmosphere in Israeli
society?
Do you see parallels in ordinary life?
Role Descriptions for Groupings - see Appendix 1
Peace Now
Judea & Samaria Settlers' Council
Labor
Likud
Shas
Meretz
National Religious Party
United Torah Judaism
Appendix 1 - Role Descriptions for Groupings
See also lobbies on: http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/festivls/zkatz/atz/etzion8.html
Parties on http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/actual/elections/outlook.html
Members of the 15th Knesset on http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/go.asp?MFAH00jq0
Knesset bios on http://www1.knesset.gov.il/asp/mk/mkindex15_eng.asp
|
Shalom Achshav - Peace Now
Leader: Mossi Raz. Includes politicians from the Labor Party and
Meretz, with youth movements like Hashomer Hatzair and Habonim Dror,
plus wide sections of the unaffiliated public.
Shalom Achshav was launched in July 1977 by a letter signed by
300 IDF reserve officers. The letter urged Prime Minister Menachem
Begin to hand back the West Bank and Gaza Strip in order to advance
the chances of peace agreements. Its slogan was: "Peace (shalom)
is better than the whole (shelema) Land of Israel."
Shalom Achshav warmly welcomed the Camp David Agreements in March
1979. Its members have since protested against every government
measure which they consider to be a stumbling block to peace, such
as the proposal to expand existing West Bank settlements, or to
add new ones. Their demonstrations today also appeal for the supremacy
of democracy in political decision-making, and most of its supporters
would prefer a secular State.
|
|
Judea & Samaria Settlers' Council
This is a representative body and more in the public eye today
than the GUSH EMUNIM - "BLOC OF THE FAITHFUL" movement
which was the original political lobby for settlement in Gush Etzion,
Judea, Samaria, and later in the Jordan Valley & the Gaza Strip.
Gush Emunim was formally set up in Kfar Etzion in 1974, by members
of the National Religious Party, the Land of Israel Movement, students
of the Yeshiva Merkaz Harav, and members of the Bnei Akiva movement.
They were responsible for the establishment of a large number of
settlements in the territories, sometimes following violent confrontations
with the authorities. In many ways, they developed new models of
small rural and urban communities - some religious, some secular,
and some mixed.
They work to implement their belief in the fact that the creation
of the State of Israel is the "beginning of the Redemption",
which will lead to total redemption through the settlement of all
the territories situated west of the Jordan. Today, the focus of
their work is to represent their constituents' needs: for personal
security, the contribution of clusters of Jewish settlements to
state security, the need for more housing for growing communities
- against the threat of geographical isolation and even eviction,
in the Final Status talks with the Palestinians.
|
|
Shas
A party now led by Minister Eli Ben Yishai but still dominated
by the figure of Rabbi Ovadia Ben Yosef. Shas feels it has achieved
representation for a religious and traditional Sephardi constituency
which has been ignored and repressed and which can now speak out
for its beliefs. In particular, it makes recriminations about the
early socialist parties treatment of Olim from Arab lands who were
encouraged to reject Jewish religious observance and how this is
enshrined in legislation and the justice system.
http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/actual/elections/shasplatform.html
See also http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/actual/draft4.html
|
|
National Religious Party
Led by Minister Rabbi Yitzhak Levy, the NRP has lost some of its
hawkish supporters to other parties and lobbies, but stands firm
by its support of "settlements" under the Rule of Law.
Many of its constituents live in Judea & Samaria, but its views
are somewhat more moderate than those of the Settlers' Council's
most vocal representatives. The party's views on the Jewish nature
of life in Israel are also central to an area of public controversy.
http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/actual/elections/mafdalplatform.html
See also http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/actual/draft4.html
|
Appendix 2 - Speaker's Notes for Guest[s] of Honor [use those ideas*
which are relevant!]
No-one of us can undo the tragedy of the Rabin assassination, but together
we can change the political and social climate in our society and thus
prevent the threat of another assassination in our country. This country
is home to all of us: we need to adjust to the fact that with the most
imaginative vision of the future it is still necessary to live with reality.
It is no easy task, but I feel it is my privilege to be part of this
process. The time for demagogic demands to all and sundry that everyone
respect each other has passed - we must all try to make demands on ourselves,
instead, and be our own critics as to whether we have lived up to our
promises. Let us begin with ourselves - all of us.
For my own part, I wish to say that a person gives up much his or her
privacy when he or she takes public office. We may even lose touch with
the everyday realities of ordinary life and be insensitive to stress or
distress caused by our weighty decisions of state or our behavior towards
marginal groups. We need to explain why we make these decisions, we must
uphold the rule of law with integrity in our own behavior.
 I apologize
for my own previous insensitivity to the acute distress generated by my
own focus on one important political goal, to the detriment of other issues
and other viewpoints. I will endeavor to listen to these positions more
attentively, offer more explanations, discuss them as a priority, but
in the context of the other issues on our agenda.
I apologize
for my intense criticism of those with different positions and my impatience,
which have a disproportional influence on the public because of my public
position. I will express myself in more sympathetic and moderate terms
and allow others the right to present their ideas in an environment of
debate.
I regret
that I have isolated myself in what others see as an elitist environment
in which I do not represent the people in my political constituency or
a real sector of the public, but myself, my position, and the ideas of
a small circle around me. I will seek out wider ranges of opinion, I will
advocate use of professional and specialist advice rather than relying
on sources connected to sectorial or political expedience.
I accept
that our society is legitimately composed of a wide range of opinions,
and that all those which do not advocate the destruction of the state
are entitled to my attention and respect, and they will receive my consideration.
This is part of democracy, as the decision of the majority.
Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to those who have come
together today to apply the lessons of mistakes made by all of us and
make a new beginning possible.
|
|