|
Hearing at the Hague
Ten Key Questions
By Robert Klein
Editor: Gila Ansell Brauner
UN Secretary General's Summary to UN General Assembly,
24th November 2003
Annex II
Summary legal position of the Palestine Liberation Organization
From: UN Secretary General's Summary to theUN General Assembly,
24th November 2003
Source: http://www.reliefweb.int/w/rwb.nsf/0/0e0abe0d890c7e8a85256dec006600c7?OpenDocument
1. The Palestine Liberation Organization legal opinion requested
for this report cites several provisions and principles of international
law as bearing on the question of the legality of the construction
of the Barrier within the occupied Palestinian territory. Among
them:
- Israel has a right to undertake certain limited measures in cases
of strict military necessity and to protect its legitimate security
interests. However, these measures must be taken in accordance with
international human rights and humanitarian law.
- The measure of constructing the wall within the occupied Palestinian
territory and related measures taken by the Government of Israel
constitute violations of international humanitarian law because
those measures are not justified by military necessity and violate
the principle of proportionality. The harm those measures have caused
include:
- Extensive destruction of Palestinian homes and other property
and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity,
contrary to the Fourth Geneva Convention;
- Infringements on the freedom of movement contrary to the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in
violation of the obligations of the Government of Israel under
the Fourth Geneva Convention;
- Infringements on the rights to education, work, an adequate
standard of living and health care contrary to the Convention
on the Rights of the Child and the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and in violation of the
obligations of the Government of Israel pursuant to the Fourth
Geneva Convention;
- Violations of the prohibition against arbitrary interference
of home contrary to the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights and the freedom to choose one's residence
contrary to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights and in violation of the protections provided in the Fourth
Geneva Convention as a result of the permit system established
in the Closed Area.
2. This violation of these Palestinian rights, including facilitating
the entry into and residency of Israeli civilians in the Closed
Area while restricting Palestinian access to and residency in that
Area, are causing long-term, permanent harm, including the transfer
of Palestinians, contrary to the Fourth Geneva Convention and the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
- Because these Israeli measures are neither necessary nor proportionate,
they give rise to criminal liability by the Government of Israel
for violations of human rights and some prima facie grave breaches
of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
- The requirement of proportionality can more likely be met by
building the Barrier within Israeli territory or even on the Green
Line and by evacuating the Israeli civilian nationals currently
residing in the Occupied West Bank contrary to international law.
- The construction of the Barrier is an attempt to annex the territory
contrary to international law.
- The de facto annexation of land interferes with the territorial
sovereignty and consequently with the right of the Palestinians
to self-determination.
* Palestinians often call this system the Separation Wall and Israelis
use the term Security Fence. For the purposes of the present report,
the more general term "the Barrier" is used.
|