FISH ETHIOPIAN STYLE
FROM THE MELTING POT BY ISRAEL AHARONI
Ingredients:
6 small, whole fish (dennis, marlen or bakala)
2 sliced tomatoes
2 sliced potatoes
2 sliced onions
4 fresh hot peppers, sliced
For gravy:
6 cloves of minced garlic
2 tablespoons, ground hot pepper
1/2 teaspoon ground cardimon
1 teaspoon turmeric
2 teaspoons salt
1/2 cup oil
1/2 cup water
Preparation
- Place the potatoes, onion, tomatoes and hot peppers in a pan and place the fish on top of them. Mix the ingredients for the gravy and pour on top of the fish.
- Bake at 360 degrees Fahrenheit for half an hour.
B'Te'avon! Bon Appetit!
More in this issue...
ISRAEL: JEWISH AND DEMOCRATIC
A RESPONSE TO YOSSI BEILIN
We are adding to the Agenda an article by Chaim Chesler, Treasurer of the Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization
This article appeared in the Jerusalem Post on June 26, 2000.
Yossi Beilin, in a paper recently published by the World Jewish Congress, writes of his concern about the «dwindling number of Jews in the world and the growing alienation between Israel and the Diaspora communities.» To grapple with these problems, he suggests the creation of a «new framework for Jewish life» that will bring Israel and Diaspora Jewry closer through the creation of a Jewish parliament, while restating his criticisms of existing frameworks that allow precisely for this form of engagement.
For more than a quarter of a century Beilin has been voicing these criticisms, including attacking the Jewish Agency as an organization that is irrelevant to Israeli society and todays Jewish world. His criticisms display a lack of understanding for the Agencys pivotal role in creating dialogue between Jews; ignore the evolution of the Agency to ensure its continued relevance to the changing Jewish world; and are damaging to the stability of that world.
The Jewish Agency, though effective as the executive branch of the Jewish world, he argues, is ineffective as a place for dialogue. This ignores the involvement by Jewish communities in governing the Jewish Agency, as well as the Agencys many programs that create a direct relationship between communities in Israel and the Diaspora an engagement that world Jewry actively seeks.
Indeed, today, after the IDF withdrawal from southern Lebanon, the Jewish Agency has forgiven much of the debts of the northern frontier settlements, and is working with world Jewry to raise and allocate special funds to improve the regions cultural and social services, in cooperation with the governments activities to strengthen this area of the country.
Dr. Beilin and I do agree on the urgent need to grapple with the problem of weakening Jewish identity. Several years ago, the Jewish Agency developed the concept of intense, educational visits to Israel by Diaspora youth. We see «Birthright» as our partner to bring even more youth to Israel.
Beilin also claims that the Jewish Agency impedes the involvement of Diaspora Jews in Israel and propagates inequality between the Jewish people and the Jewish State. He notes that while the funds provided by world Jewry once represented a significant percentage of Israels national budget, today they account for less than one-half percent. Yet in focusing on the donations of world Jewry in purely financial terms, Beilin ignores the evolution of the relationship between Israel and world Jewry.
Today, Israel is no longer holding out its hand for donations, but, through fundraising campaigns, is allowing the country and world Jewry to develop strategic partnerships together. While Beilin suggests that there is no role for Jewish communities in building Israel, world Jewry wants to be involved; the Jewish Agency allows it that involvement.
More recently, rather than seeking a solution to the decades of deprivation the countrys Arab minority have faced under Israeli rule, Beilin has used the High Court of Justice ruling that it is illegal to prevent an Arab family from buying a home in the Jewish community of Katzir, to claim that the Jewish Agency is a tool of discrimination between Jews and Arabs, and is thereby harming the Zionist enterprise.
No less a person than Supreme Court president, Aharon Barak, one of the judges in the Katzir ruling, argues that precisely at the center of the Zionist enterprise is the strengthening of Jewish settlement. He has stated that there is no contradiction between this and equality for all Israels citizens. How then can Beilin argue that the Jewish Agency is harming the Zionist ideal and the Jewish state?
In his paper, Beilin suggests that Zionism was not the culmination of two thousand years of dreaming of a return to Zion, but simply a response to anti-Semitism. Thus, Herzl should have accepted the British proposal for the settlement of Jews in East Africa. Where, here, is Beilins Zionism?
Israel is not some piece of real estate. It is a crucial element in Jewish civilization, the apex of Jewish peoplehood and nationality; the Jewish Agency is the only forum that unites world Jewish identity around Israel.
It is the only forum that discusses worldwide Jewish needs, receives and allocates Jewish resources and grapples with Jewish issues. There is always the need for greater participation, but that is no reason to break apart the existing structure without a workable alternative. While Beilins concern for the future well-being of the Jewish people is undoubtedly genuine, his criticisms of the Jewish Agency are misplaced and damaging to the very cause he cares for so much.
More in this issue...